REVIEW-PROCESS

IRPMS Journal invites you to submit a manuscript providing envision to publish high- quality, peer-reviewed research articles. Articles are considered for publication on condition that these are contributed solely to IRPMS, that they have not been published previously in print and are not under consideration by another publication. Once the articles are submitted to IRPMS they will be sent for the double blind peer-review process. Reviewers will be asked at the time they are asked to critique a manuscript if they have conflicts of interest that could complicate their review. Reviewers must disclose to editors any conflicts of interest that could bias their opinions of the manuscript, and should recue themselves from reviewing specific manuscripts if the potential for bias exists. Reviewers must not use knowledge of the work they’re reviewing before its publication to further their own interests.

IRPMS has already made it absolutely clear, that the reviewers should keep manuscripts, associated material, and the information strictly confidential and they must not retain the manuscript for their personal use and should destroy paper copies of manuscripts and delete electronic copies after submitting their reviews. IRPMS ensures timely processing of manuscripts with the resources available to us. Peer review is the critical assessment of manuscripts submitted to journals by experts, because unbiased, independent, critical assessment is an intrinsic part of all scholarly work, including scientific research, peer review is an important extension of the scientific process.

Selection of appropriate reviewers and their numbers will be decided by the editor in chief and associate editors of IRPMS. The reviewers will have access to all materials that may be relevant to the evaluation of the manuscript. IRPMS is a peer-reviewed journal and it is under no obligation to send submitted manuscripts for review, and under no obligation to follow reviewer recommendations, favorable or negative. The editor of a journal is ultimately responsible for the selection of all its content and editorial decisions may be informed by issues unrelated to the quality of a manuscript, such as suitability for the journal. An editor can reject any article at any time before publication, including after acceptance if concerns arise about the integrity of the work or in case of its duplications.

After getting the reviewer’s comments the manuscript will be sent back to corresponding author for needful corrections to get it published in IRPMS. After receiving the corrected manuscript with copy-right form final decision will be made regarding its publication in IRPMS journal issue. In the selection of papers and in regard to priority of publication, the opinion of the editor will be final. Finally, the Editor shall have the right to edit, condense, alter, rearrange or rewrite approved articles, before publication without reference to the authors concerned.

Our Journal will also notify reviewers of the ultimate decision to accept or reject a paper, and should acknowledge the contribution of peer reviewers to this journal. IRPMS believe that true scientific peer review begins only on the date a paper is published. In that spirit, we invite readers to submit their comments, questions, or criticisms directly to the authors or to us about published articles within 3 months after its publication so queries can be respond appropriately.